|
|
|
|
이영화 ( Lee Young-Hwa ) - 강남성모병원
김남초 ( Kim Nam-Cho ) - 가톨릭대학교 간호대학
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was to compare the effects of 2% lidocaine intradermal injection and 10% lidocaine spray for pain and anxiety relief on the arteriovenous fistula puncture.
Methods: The subjects were 34 patients who were getting hemodialysis 3 times a week. The intradermal 2% lidocaine on the arteriovenous fistula puncture was injected to all subjects for the first 1 week and 10% lidocaine was sprayed for the following 1 week. The anxiety was measured using visual analogue scale (VAS), blood pressure and pulse. The pain was measured using VAS and non-verbal pain behavior scale.
Results: The VAS anxiety scores, blood pressure, and pulse rate were not significantly different in two methods. In the VAS pain and non- verbal pain scores, 2% lidocaine intradermal injection caused significantly lower pain than 10% lidocaine spray.
Conclusion: 10% lidocaine spray compared with 2% lidocaine intradermal injection is less effective for reducing pain and anxiety on arteriovenous fistula puncture. However, 35.3% of the subjects showed satisfactory response to 10% lidocaine spray method, and 58.8% of them were willing to use it again. Therefore, the further study on lidocaine amount and optimum time for needle puncture after spray method is required.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
동정맥루 천자, 국소마취, 통증, 불안
Arteriovenous Fistula, Local anesthesia, Pain, Anxiety
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
|